Skip to content

Conversation

RalfJung
Copy link
Member

@RalfJung RalfJung commented Nov 11, 2023

Fixes #117806

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 11, 2023

r? @davidtwco

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 11, 2023
@davidtwco
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 19, 2023

📌 Commit f6a49ba has been approved by davidtwco

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 19, 2023
@davidtwco
Copy link
Member

@bors rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 19, 2023

⌛ Testing commit f6a49ba with merge d0474fb...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 19, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: davidtwco
Pushing d0474fb to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 19, 2023
@bors bors merged commit d0474fb into rust-lang:master Nov 19, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Nov 19, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (d0474fb): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.4% [-0.4%, -0.4%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.0% [3.0%, 3.0%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-4.9% [-4.9%, -4.9%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.2% [-4.2%, -4.2%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -4.9% [-4.9%, -4.9%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.8% [2.3%, 3.4%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 674.69s -> 676.64s (0.29%)
Artifact size: 313.81 MiB -> 313.81 MiB (-0.00%)

@RalfJung RalfJung deleted the raw-str-slice branch November 20, 2023 07:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ICE: Got a scalar pair where a scalar was expected
6 participants